Growth matters but income levels matter more

(Mains GS 3 : Indian Economy and issues relating to planning, mobilization, of resources, growth, development and employment.)

Context:

• The provisional estimates of annual national income (2020-21), released recently by the National Statistical Office shows nothing encouraging in the numbers.
• Economic recovery and employment faces severe dent specially after second Covid wave.

Performance of the key sectors:

• The agriculture sector continued its impressive growth performance, reiterating that it still remains as the vital sector of the economy, especially at times of crisis. 
• The manufacturing sector continued its subdued growth performance, failing to emerge as the growth driver, with production interruptions due to localised lockdowns to be blamed.
•  The contraction in trade (-18.2%), construction (-8.6%), mining (-8.5%) and manufacturing (-7.2%) is a matter of concern as these sectors account for the bulk of low-skilled jobs.

Growth still sluggish:

• Gross Domestic Product (GDP) at Constant (2011-12) Prices in Q4 of 2020-21 is showing a growth of 1.6%, slightly better than expected.
• But for a period when the restrictions on mobility and economic activity witnessed reduction, this performance looks below par. 
• Further, this growth, which is an improvement over the 0.5% rate of growth in the previous quarter, is a statistical artefact as it is not devoid of the base effect and seasonality which plagues quarterly estimates. 
• The magnitude of contraction in the economy and the policy responses towards it is an important issue as it shows growth prospects for the next year.

Rising unemployment rate:

• Contextualising the current growth rates in terms of some other macroeconomic data would provide us a better perspective on growth recovery.
• First, the unemployment data released by the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) says, “In May 2021, India’s labour participation rate at 40 per cent was the same as it was in April 2021.
•  But, the unemployment rate shot up to 11.9 per cent from 8 per cent in April.
•  A stable labour participation rate combined with a higher unemployment rate implies a loss of jobs and a fall in the employment rate.
• The employment rate fell to 35.3 per cent in May 2021 from 36.8 per cent in April 2021.

Second wave dented recovery:

• May 2021 was a particularly stressful month on the jobs front as it was the fourth consecutive month of a fall in employment. 
• According to CMIE, over 15 million jobs were lost in May 2021, higher than the 12.3 million in November 2016, the month of demonetisation. 
• The more worrying fact is that the cumulative fall in employment since January 2021 is 25.3 million of which 22.7 million were in the first quarter of FY 2021-2022, that is, during April and May. 
• This shows that the second wave of the pandemic has already dented economic activities, postponing recovery further. 
• The job losses also bring out the high informality and vulnerability of labour in India as of the total jobs lost during April-May, 17.2 million were of daily wage earners.

The prospects of growth revival:

• Elementary textbook economics tells us that employment and aggregate demand in an economy are related via the channel of disposable incomes of workers.
• We also know that aggregate demand and output growth have a positive correlation.
• Hence, the prospects of growth revival in the next year look bleak at the moment and from this perspective, it is worrying that in just April and May 2021, India lost 25 million non-farm jobs.

Low business confidence:

• Business confidence index (BCI), from the survey by the industry body FICCI, plummeted to 51.5 from 74.2 in the previous round. 
• The survey also highlights the weak demand conditions in the economy.
• It says, “With household income being severely impacted and past savings being already drawn on during the first wave of infections, demand conditions can be expected to remain weak for longer.”
•  Compounding this is the uncertainty arising out of the imposition of localised curbs due to the second wave of infections and a muddled vaccine policy in the country.

The Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index: 

• Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) also throws some light on the shape of things to come.
• PMI has slipped to a 10-month low indicating that the manufacturing sector is showing signs of strain with growth projections being revised lower.
• Both BCI and PMI slipping down indicates that the overall optimism towards 2021-22 is low, which could impact investments and cause further job losses.

Demand recovery:

• Growth recovery depends on demand recovery. 
• External demand looks robust as India’s exports touched $32 billion in May 2021, 67% higher than in May 2020 and 8% more than in May 2019. 
• The combined increase in exports of April and May 2021 is over 12% indicating that global demand rebound is much faster than the domestic demand. 
• Stimulus programmes and a sharp decline in COVID-19 infections seem to be aiding these economies. 

Government’s response:

• Since last year, the policy responses have been to rely on credit easing, focusing more on supply side measures, with more and more guarantees by the government to improve flow of credit to important sectors. 
• There has been less direct action by the government to support the vulnerable to alleviate their hardships. 
• There were some sector-specific measures to alleviate distress in certain sectors, which were timely. 

More needs to be done:

• However, this policy stance is unlikely to prop up growth for three reasons. 
• First, the bulk of the policy measures, including the most recent, are supply side measures and not on the demand side.
• In times of financial anxiety, what is needed is direct state spending for a quick demand boost. 
• Second, large parts of all the stimulus packages announced till now would work only in the medium term.
• These include policies related to the external sector, infrastructure and manufacturing sector. 
• In fact, some of the policies towards agriculture, such as productivity enhancement through the introduction of new varieties, will only work over years.
• Third, the use of credit backstops as the main plank of policy has limits compared to any direct measure on the demand side as this could result in poor growth performance if private investments do not pick up.
• Further, the credit easing approach would take a longer time to multiply incomes as lending involves a lender’s discretion and borrower’s obligation. 
• Interestingly, a tight-fisted fiscal policy approach comes at a time when conventional fiscal stimulus packages might not be enough as supply side issues arising out of episodic lockdowns need to be addressed simultaneously. 

Conclusion:

• A sharp revival in overall demand is required for ensuring recovery path.
• Focusing on short-term magnified growth rates resting on low bases might be erroneous, as income levels matter more than growth rates at this juncture.
• Focusing on growth rates has its merits in the long term as achieving higher income levels require sustained growth for longer periods.
• Bangladesh seems to be doing this without much fanfare, but the quest for sustained higher growth has been elusive for India for the last five years.